Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: surv tre  (Read 612 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
trewej
? :/
Vanguard 2275
****
Offline Offline

QAuth: trewej
Posts: 74

Games: 2203
Rank: 112
lastgame: 172 days ago


« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2011, 03:53:45 am »

okok i really fucked up again some games but really those were exceptions but yea really bad played. i actually cant play dota for the next month(s?) but calm down about me and sorry that i fucked up your mood by eventually beeing in some bad games in a row.

ps: actually Wizz describes what i thought yet pretty good.

so cya in some time just let this rest for a while.

ayay bye bye
Logged
TaurenTimmy
Cranium Basher 3220
*****
Offline Offline

QAuth: timmy1986
Posts: 186

Games: 1011
Rank: 281
lastgame: 62 days ago


« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2011, 03:22:37 pm »

!support remove  He is not fit for xp yet.
Logged
wizz
Anyone got PUDGE ???
Divine Rapier 7800
*
Offline Offline

France France
QAuth: hg
Posts: 1423


Games: 4458
Rank: 21
lastgame: 95 days ago


« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2011, 07:58:41 pm »

!support remove  He is not fit for xp yet.

Funny, you said this not long ago in his former surv thread :

Quote
!Not supporting remove.

I can say that i havent seen his worst sides when playing, but when i have pld with him he usally is doing fine ,and has no problem playing in XP.
In my opinion hes good enough to play in XP, and i have often been picking him in challenges and it ended up with good results.

This is exactly what i meant in my last post in this thread. To request someone's removal is the hardest thing you can do as a user. If your request goes through, a dude is denied from playing. If YOU, xp users, aren't even abale to take removal requests seriously. Then I just won't bother reading your feedbacks anymore. HOW THE FUCK can I take you seriously after this joke ?

Trewej first removal thread was handled fair enough. He got enough back up from vouchers AND users (yes, including yours). I'm not saying you can't change your opinion from !deny removal to !approve it. However, done like this with 1) close to 0 arguments , 2) based on 0 replay or facts and 3) barely stating he's not ready. Sounds as if you didn't know him at all...

I'm denying this. I won't accept another request about him before next season begins. Personally i feel there's nothing to complain about the handling of the last request against him. If you (and i mean the xp users) feel he should have been removed, then ask yourselves if you couldn't have participated more or better.

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.107 seconds with 27 queries.

Google visited this page May 12, 2012, 08:35:34 pm