obvious ragerequest
i played with him much games the last days and he is a player that fits into xp
Rage or not, we all have our shity games from time to time ofcs.
But he didnt even ask for laneswap, opponents had lots of lowhp heroes, he was certainly able to gank a lot more then he did / tried to.
Yes its hard to gank lvl 7 heroes when you just lvl 4 yourself, but hey, if the lane is close to impossible then say something, just a tp in the laneshop and swap with someone from bot.
Do you guys think Wiek, (Enigma) even tried to sharpen up in that game? He obviously didnt give a shit about winning / losing.
As I said, ofcs you will have bad games from time to time, but this was REALLY bad, especially from Enigma.
Maybe qop doesnt deserve surv for one game, but maybe this makes him try a bit harder next time and actually try to think one step ahead.
Put yourself into my position in that game, watching our qop, enigma and puck sometimes just dying totally useless, over, over and overa again. You would get frustated, dont say otherwise.
If Enigma just had bought 2 wards at start and a chicken, the outcome of the early game would have been totally diffrent, Admiral would have been ganked at all prolly.
We didnt have 1 decent BH either, or maybe 1 no more.
Being 8-10 lvls below average lvl all the game, is horrible, doesnt matter how much they focus you, its just superbad.
Its also hard to know what "bad enough" sometimes, I admit though that at the point I made the, I was furius, (nerd rage).
I know Cip wrote somewhere that xp is sopposed to have much higher standards of gameplay then euro, and that very poor gameplay wont be tolerated,(maybe not those exact words) but something like that.
So please tell me, what is bad enough to get someone under surv for 1 game?
Before you comment, please watch the replay, and check enigma, qop and puck.
Messy post but im no good writer so bare with me please.