Register
Login
Home
Forum
Help
you are here:
Dotapickup
»
Forum
»
CHANNELS
»
#dotapickup.xp
»
Old XP stuff
»
Old XP surveillance/ban requests
» [Surveillance] angeltear
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Author Topic: [Surveillance] angeltear (Read 894 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MrMojo
Eye of Skadi 6950
Offline
QAuth: MrMojo
Posts: 999
Games: 1296
Rank: 218
lastgame: 303 days ago
[Surveillance] angeltear
«
on:
November 27, 2008, 03:46:28 pm »
Ive put him under surveillance.
Before game started someone said: Whoever gets angeltear will lose.
And my team got him ofc.
He picked bane and his only job was to sleep treant before he could do ultimate.
He failed. Miserably.
Put under surveillance, comment here.
Logged
baalzamon
Gem of True Sight 750
Offline
QAuth: baalzamon
Posts: 26
Games: 1283
Rank: 220
lastgame: 1006 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #1 on:
November 27, 2008, 10:36:37 pm »
The worst surveillance i have ever seen. Shap up admins.
Logged
grazzt
Battle Fury 4785
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: grazzt
Posts: 335
Games: 1612
Rank: 173
lastgame: 529 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #2 on:
November 28, 2008, 12:49:31 am »
Have just played against him, he did Lion ok, nothing bad there. One of the better on their team.
Logged
angelnomore
Broadsword 1200
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: angelnomore
Posts: 38
Games: 977
Rank: 292
lastgame: 1107 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #3 on:
November 28, 2008, 03:02:49 am »
Also, very mature to get that "the one that gets angeltear will lose".
You should be ashamed of beeing an admin and act like a child.
Failed bane, well. Sure I falied 2 sleeps on a hero that was well protected and invis. While their carrys was phat farmed, while ours was fail. Its nice to have someone to blame.
Logged
only change is consistant
Demons-Loan
Guinsoo's Scythe 5175
Offline
Germany
QAuth: DoS-Loan
Posts: 415
Games: 806
Rank: 328
lastgame: 918 days ago
worthy again
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #4 on:
November 28, 2008, 03:13:07 am »
I kinda recall a DK played by angeltear where was about to build battle fury. We could stop him before he finished it and he took our advice and built something else.
No offense, just saying.
«
Last Edit: November 28, 2008, 03:15:03 am by Demons-Loan
»
Logged
dies ist eine siegnatur,
angelnomore
Broadsword 1200
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: angelnomore
Posts: 38
Games: 977
Rank: 292
lastgame: 1107 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #5 on:
November 28, 2008, 03:28:50 am »
The fun thing is that you though that i didnt know cleave worked only melee, which I do know. I got an early perc. and wanted to make something of it. The game, we won and i was tanking well. You couldnt have got that in also? While you were at it?
Logged
only change is consistant
Demons-Loan
Guinsoo's Scythe 5175
Offline
Germany
QAuth: DoS-Loan
Posts: 415
Games: 806
Rank: 328
lastgame: 918 days ago
worthy again
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #6 on:
November 28, 2008, 03:57:39 am »
Well actually you didnt get an early "perc" if you're talking about "perc" like in peserverance. You had the RoH and reaper asked you "what you gonna do with it?" and you said "bf". Instead of waiting for 75g in the first place to get a helm for either helm of the dominator or armlet. Way more usefull on DK.
Logged
dies ist eine siegnatur,
Famous-Wisp
Cranium Basher 3220
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: Wispan
Posts: 184
Games: 3165
Rank: 63
lastgame: 144 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #7 on:
November 28, 2008, 04:26:58 am »
If mojo finds lowskill it gotta be looooooooow
SO I VOUCH THIS!)))))))
Logged
FuRoR
Käpt'n FuRoR
Sacred Relic 3800
Offline
Germany
QAuth: Julian--
Posts: 272
Games: 3914
Rank: 33
lastgame: 108 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #8 on:
November 28, 2008, 05:49:06 am »
i dont support this, hes a nice guy and plays ok. you can put him under surveillace for just your opinion?!
«
Last Edit: November 28, 2008, 06:01:15 am by FuRoR
»
Logged
(00:10:13) (DrFurunkel) Was umrundet einen Planeten ? [53-100]<br />(00:10:15) (@Bud_Spencer) sonne
angelnomore
Broadsword 1200
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: angelnomore
Posts: 38
Games: 977
Rank: 292
lastgame: 1107 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #9 on:
November 28, 2008, 06:35:26 am »
I also think that one should read :
" READ THIS FIRST! - How and why request removal on someone from xp channel "
.. before posting Surveillance.
Logged
only change is consistant
GladiusZ
no hype, just results
Refresher Orb 5575
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: GladiusZ
Posts: 569
Games: 1356
Rank: 207
lastgame: 894 days ago
Numquam sapiens irascitur
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #10 on:
November 28, 2008, 11:21:19 am »
Quote from: Famous-Wisp on November 28, 2008, 04:26:58 am
If mojo finds lowskill it gotta be looooooooow
SO I VOUCH THIS!)))))))
So you base your vouch on nothing. I see no replay, no evidence. Nothing but the word of an admin. But I guess that's how it goes... And yeah, what's up with the "however gets angeltear will loose". I know MrMojo didn't state it, but to listen to immature, stupid comments like that and then base a surveillance request on it... "Just sleep treant before he ulties". Unless treant is very bad, that's kinda hard to do. And yeah angel is my friend so I am biased, just as wisp is Mojos friend.
Logged
jesuskvistus
Big Black Dude
Bloodstone 5075
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: |sa|svinet
Posts: 360
Games: 1473
Rank: 187
lastgame: 1071 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #11 on:
November 28, 2008, 12:48:04 pm »
Give out the replay. What is there to discuss if you show nothing?
Logged
wizz
Anyone got PUDGE ???
Divine Rapier 7800
Offline
France
QAuth: hg
Posts: 1423
Games: 4458
Rank: 21
lastgame: 93 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #12 on:
November 28, 2008, 02:00:09 pm »
Quote from: GladiusZ on November 28, 2008, 11:21:19 am
Quote from: Famous-Wisp on November 28, 2008, 04:26:58 am
If mojo finds lowskill it gotta be looooooooow
SO I VOUCH THIS!)))))))
So you base your vouch on nothing. I see no replay, no evidence. Nothing but the word of an admin. But I guess that's how it goes... And yeah, what's up with the "however gets angeltear will loose". I know MrMojo didn't state it, but to listen to immature, stupid comments like that and then base a surveillance request on it... "Just sleep treant before he ulties". Unless treant is very bad, that's kinda hard to do. And yeah angel is my friend so I am biased, just as wisp is Mojos friend.
I think he got a point.
MrMojo is admin so we have to trust him and i'm ok with that. Yet it would be nice to post replay in a surv post. Plus the fact that the argument of sleeping tree is hardly buyable as I'm very doubtful the dear tree would come unprotected, not stealthed in front of bane saying " OH YEAH SLEEP ME PLZ" .
Anyway surveillance is only surveillance, not removal.
Logged
MrMojo
Eye of Skadi 6950
Offline
QAuth: MrMojo
Posts: 999
Games: 1296
Rank: 218
lastgame: 303 days ago
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #13 on:
November 28, 2008, 03:14:33 pm »
http://www.dota-allstars.com/replay/76282/index.html
In case you wonder about my itembuild..its bugged. It was +str threads and the armlet is missing.
In his surveillance message its written: "comment".
I didnt write "question my surveillance"
Comment if you had games with him, and either support or deny the surveillance.
I never said that this surveillance will be the ultimate. If the response keeps being positive, his surveillance will be removed as fast, as it was done.
«
Last Edit: November 28, 2008, 03:45:12 pm by MrMojo
»
Logged
GladiusZ
no hype, just results
Refresher Orb 5575
Offline
Sweden
QAuth: GladiusZ
Posts: 569
Games: 1356
Rank: 207
lastgame: 894 days ago
Numquam sapiens irascitur
Re: [Surveillance] angeltear
«
Reply #14 on:
November 28, 2008, 05:38:42 pm »
Ok so I've watched the replay, thx for putting it up. Trying to be objective now. First off we had a dual lane bane which bought early wards to help lesh mid with rune control. Angel the kept on buying wards doing support more or less throughout the game. Think he did a good job there, aswell as overall game play. The game had basically 3 big fights 1 sent push and 2 scourge pushes where Mojo insisted on sleeping tree. First one angel was behind everyone else cause of the running around/splitting up chaos before the ramp was reached, so he wasn't in range for sleep. Next one was the deff here the game was lost/won. Here luna rushes out windwalking which wasn't all that good imo (leoric should go first but nvm he was close after). Angel didn't react in time and had boots only so treant got his ulti off. In the third fight game was over and treant was sleeping for some time before he got his ult off. I really think relying on banes sleep to counter treant isn't a good strat. Also bane is hard to play when some guys are on vent and you are not.
Other mistakes I saw:
No sentries/dust before the ~30 min mark. No ganks at lancer. No bkb on leoric (better counter than banes sleep anyday). In vital push luna triggers bkb before treant ults which is a big reason for the outcome of that battle. Leshrac didn't destroy eyes enough.
Point is there is a lot of actions you can question in a game. Scapegoats are easily created.
Edit. How come you put up surveillance first and ask question about his skills later?
«
Last Edit: November 28, 2008, 05:40:41 pm by GladiusZ
»
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
USERS
-----------------------------
=> New User Request
=====> Re-accepted
-----------------------------
CHANNELS
-----------------------------
=> #Dota2pickup.euro
=> #Dota2pickup.xp
===> #dotapickup.stream
===> IRC Votepolls
=====> XP Denied Requests
=====> Staff Requests
===> Old XP stuff
=====> Old XP games
=====> Old XP surveillance/ban requests
-----------------------------
DOTAPICKUP
-----------------------------
=====> Played Game Archive
=====> Played Games
===> dp 2v2 Tournament 2011
=====> Played Games
===> dp 1v1 tournament 2012
=====> Played Games
-----------------------------
ARCHIVES
-----------------------------
=====> Tournaments
=====> Guides
=====> Help Desk
===> New HoN User Request
=====> Accepted
=====> Denied
=====> Old & Expired
Page created in 5.151 seconds with 28 queries.
Google visited this page May 14, 2012, 01:05:45 pm
Loading...